Scientific Co-Authorship According to RSCI and Scopus Data for 2000-2020: Growth Trends
Main Article Content
Abstract
Scientific co-authorship is a direct reflection of scientific collaboration. Foreign studies based on Web of Science and Scopus data show that over the past decades there has been an increase in the number of co-authors of scientific publications in international journals in various disciplines. The paper compares the growth trends in the number of co-authors according to the RSCI and Scopus data. The study was conducted in five thematic areas (chemistry, history, mathematics, medicine, and physics) from 2000 to 2020. The article shows the identity of the trends in the growth of the number of co-authors in the cases of publications on history and mathematics, and a noticeable difference in other scientific fields.
Keywords:
Article Details
References
2. Newman M.E.J. The structure of scientific collaboration networks // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA. 2001. Vol. 98. № 2. P. 404–409. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.98.2.404
3. Дурнев С.А., Знаменская Е.А., Печников, А.А., Чебуков Д.Е. Сравнительный анализ научного соавторства в России // Библиосфера. 2025. № 3. С. 110–119. https://doi.org/10.20913/1815-3186-2025-3-110-119
4. Cronin B. Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? // Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2001. Vol. 52. № 7. P. 558–569. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1097
5. Clement T.P. Authorship matrix: a rational approach to quantify individual contributions and responsibilities in multi-author scientific articles // Science and Engineering Ethics. 2014. Vol. 20. № 2. P. 345–361. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11948-013-9454-3
6. Resnik D.B., Tyle A.M., Black J.R., Kissling G. Authorship policies of scientific journals // Journal of Medical Ethics. 2016. Vol. 42. № 3. P. 199–202. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2015-103171
7. Osborne J.W., Holland A. What is authorship, and what should it be? A survey of prominent guidelines for determining authorship in scientific publications // Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation. 2019. Vol. 14. № 1. Article Number 15. 19 pp. https://doi.org/10.7275/25pe-ba85
8. Thelwall M., Maflahi N. Research coauthorship 1900–2020: Continuous, universal, and ongoing expansion // Quantitative Science Studies. 2022. Vol. 3. № 2. P. 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00188
9. Research Co-authorship 1900-2020: Continuous, universal, and ongoing expansion. URL: https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Research_Co-authorship_1900-2020_Continuous_universal_and_ongoing_expansion/17064419.
10. Российский индекс научного цитирования (РИНЦ). URL: https://elibrary.ru/project_risc.asp.
11. Коды ГРНТИ. URL: https://грнти.рф/kody-grnti.
12. О новом рейтинге журналов Science Index. URL: https://elibrary.ru/projects/science_index/ranking_info.asp.
13. Список журналов, входящих в базу данных RSCI. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/projects/rsci/rsci.pdf.
14. Appendix 1. URL: https://homepage.mi-ras.ru/~tche/download/appendix1.xlsx.
15. Классификация ASJC в Scopus. URL: https://научныепереводы.рф/classification_asjc_scopus.
16. Антопольский А.Б., Белоозеров В.Н., Маркарова Т.С., Дмитриева Е.Ю. Установление соответствий рубрик ГРНТИ рубрикам других систем классификации научной и технической информации // Научно-техническая информация. Сер. 1. Организация и методика информационной работы. 2015.
№ 3. С. 3–19.
17. Сеть классификационных систем. URL: http://rffi20.viniti.ru.
18. NISO. CRediT, Contributor Roles Taxonomy. URL: https://groups.niso.org/higherlogic/ws/public/download/26466/ANSI-NISO-Z39.104-2022.pdf.
19. Губа К.С., Словогородский Н.А. Publish or Perish в российских социальных науках: паттерны соавторства в «хищных» и «чистых» журналах // Вопросы образования. 2022. № 4. С. 80–106. https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2022-4-80-106
20. Gureev V.N., Lakizo I.G., Mazov N.A. Unethical authorship in scientific publications (a review of the problem) // Scientific and Technical Information Processing. 2019. Vol. 46. № 4. P. 219–232. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688219040026
21. Ефимова Г.З. Соавторство или соло-авторство: соблюдение традиций или свободный выбор? // Социология науки и технологий. 2022. Т. 13. №. 1. С. 130–148. https://doi.org/10.24412/2079-0910-2022-1-130-148
22. Матвеева Н.Н. Библиометрический анализ взаимодействия ученых в российских вузах: кооперация vs индивидуальная продуктивность // Университетское управление: практика и анализ. 2020. Т. 24. №. 2. С. 26–43. https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2020.02.012
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Presenting an article for publication in the Russian Digital Libraries Journal (RDLJ), the authors automatically give consent to grant a limited license to use the materials of the Kazan (Volga) Federal University (KFU) (of course, only if the article is accepted for publication). This means that KFU has the right to publish an article in the next issue of the journal (on the website or in printed form), as well as to reprint this article in the archives of RDLJ CDs or to include in a particular information system or database, produced by KFU.
All copyrighted materials are placed in RDLJ with the consent of the authors. In the event that any of the authors have objected to its publication of materials on this site, the material can be removed, subject to notification to the Editor in writing.
Documents published in RDLJ are protected by copyright and all rights are reserved by the authors. Authors independently monitor compliance with their rights to reproduce or translate their papers published in the journal. If the material is published in RDLJ, reprinted with permission by another publisher or translated into another language, a reference to the original publication.
By submitting an article for publication in RDLJ, authors should take into account that the publication on the Internet, on the one hand, provide unique opportunities for access to their content, but on the other hand, are a new form of information exchange in the global information society where authors and publishers is not always provided with protection against unauthorized copying or other use of materials protected by copyright.
RDLJ is copyrighted. When using materials from the log must indicate the URL: index.phtml page = elbib / rus / journal?. Any change, addition or editing of the author's text are not allowed. Copying individual fragments of articles from the journal is allowed for distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon article, even commercially, as long as they credit that article for the original creation.
Request for the right to reproduce or use any of the materials published in RDLJ should be addressed to the Editor-in-Chief A.M. Elizarov at the following address: amelizarov@gmail.com.
The publishers of RDLJ is not responsible for the view, set out in the published opinion articles.
We suggest the authors of articles downloaded from this page, sign it and send it to the journal publisher's address by e-mail scan copyright agreements on the transfer of non-exclusive rights to use the work.