Predicting Changes in Personality Behavior Under the Influence of an Interlocutor

Main Article Content

Fail Mubarakovich Gafarov
Pavel Nikolaevich Ustin
Konstantin Sergeevich Nikolaev

Abstract

The study of interactions between users of information systems is an urgent task in humanitarian and technical research. The paper presents the development of a regression model that predicts changes in the severity of the content components of a text under the influence of other people. The data source was short conversations (message triplets) between two users on social networks. The trained model is designed to be used as part of a cognitive architecture that reflects a model of a subject's behavior in a digital environment.

Article Details

How to Cite
Gafarov, F. M., P. N. Ustin, and K. S. Nikolaev. “Predicting Changes in Personality Behavior Under the Influence of an Interlocutor”. Russian Digital Libraries Journal, vol. 29, no. 6, Oct. 2026, pp. 2357-70, doi:10.26907/1562-5419-2026-29-6-2357-2370.

References

1. Popov L.M., Ustin P.N. Povedenie kak processual`no-dinamicheskaya xarakteristika sub``ekta // Psixologicheskij zhurnal. 2025. T. 46, № 2. S. 24–34. https://doi.org/10.7868/s3034588x25020034
2. Lomov B.F. Metodologicheskie i teoreticheskie problemy` psixologii. Moskva: Izdatel`stvo “Nauka”, 1984. 1174 s.
3. Klimov E.A. Psixologiya professional`nogo samoopredeleniya. Moskva: Izdatel`skij centr “Akademiya”, 2010. 304 s.
4. Kuzneczova Yu.M. Scenarny`j podxod k analizu tekstov // Trudy` Instituta Sistemnogo Analiza Rossijskoj Akademii Nauk. 2018. Т. 68, № 1. S. 31–41. https://doi.org/10.14357/20790279180103
5. Back M.D., Stopfer J.M., Vazire S., Gaddis S., Schmukle S.C., Egloff B., Gosling S.D. Facebook profiles reflect actual personality, not self-idealization // Psychol. Sci. 2010. Vol. 21. No. 3. P. 372–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797609360756
6. Gosling S.D., Gaddis S., Vazire S. Personality impressions based on Facebook profiles // Proc. Int. AAAI Conf. Weblogs Soc. Media. 2007. Vol. 1, No. 1. P. 1–4.
7. Quercia D., Kosinski M., Stillwell D., Crowcroft J. Our Twitter profiles, our selves: Predicting personality with Twitter // Proc. 2011 IEEE Int. Conf. Privacy Secur. Risk Trust. 2011. P. 180–185. https://doi.org/10.1109/PASSAT/SocialCom.2011.26
8. Golbeck J., Robles C., Edmondson M., Turner K. Predicting personality from Twitter // Proc. 2011 IEEE Int. Conf. Privacy Secur. Risk Trust. 2011. P. 149–156. https://doi.org/10.1109/PASSAT/SocialCom.2011.33
9. Youyou W., Kosinski M., Stillwell D. Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans // Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2015. Vol. 112, No. 4. P. 1036–1040. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1418680112
10. Kosinski M., Stillwell D., Graepel T. Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior // Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2013. Vol. 110, No. 15. P. 5802–5805. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1218772110
11. Pennebaker J.W., King L.A. Linguistic styles: Language use as an individual difference // J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1999. Vol. 77, No. 6. P. 1296–1312. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.77.6.1296
12. Kosinski M., Matz S.C., Gosling S.D., Popov V., Stillwell D. Facebook as a research tool for the social sciences: Opportunities, challenges, ethical considerations, and practical guidelines // Am. Psychol. 2015. Vol. 70, No. 6. P. 543–556. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.8
13. Gafarov F.M., Nikolaev K.S., Ustin P.N., Berdnikov A.A., Zakharova V.L., Reznichenko S.A. A Complex Neural Network Model for Predicting a Personal Success based on their Activity in Social Networks // Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ. 2021. Vol. 17, No. 10. P. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11175
14. Gafarov F., Berdnikov A., Ustin P. Predicting success of the online social network user by graph neural networks // Int. J. Adv. Intell. Informatics. 2022. Vol. 8, No. 3. P. 285–298. https://doi.org/10.26555/ijain.v8i3.859
15. Nikolaev K.S., Gafarov F.M., Ustin P.N. Metrics for Personal Profiles of Social Network Users // SHS Web Conf. 2020. Vol. 79. P. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20207901012
16. Drucker H., Burges C.J.C., Kaufman L., Smola A., Vapnik V. Support vector regression machines // Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 1997. Vol. 9. P. 155–161.
17. Breiman L. Random forests // Mach. Learn. 2001. Vol. 45. No. 1. P. 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A%3A1010933404324
18. Caruana R., Niculescu-Mizil A. An empirical comparison of supervised learning algorithms // Proc. 23rd Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. 2006. P. 161–168. https://doi.org/10.1145/1143844.1143865
19. Fan R.E., Chang K.W., Hsieh C.J., Wang X.R., Lin C.J. LIBLINEAR: A library for large linear classification // J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2008. Vol. 9. P. 1871–1874. https://doi.org/10.1145/1390681.1442794


Most read articles by the same author(s)