Designing a Non-Violent Combat System for a Children’s RPG Game

Main Article Content

Abstract

The article addresses the issue of designing a non-violent combat system for a children's RPG game. It presents the results of an empirical research. Its purpose is to obtain data to determine the balance between tactical control and direct damage mechanics.


The scientific novelty of the study lies in the empirical identification of the structure of perception by children aged 6–12 of various types of game mechanics: tactical (indirect impact on the enemy), tactical-force (neutralization without direct damage), and force (direct damage). Based on a combination of card sorting and associative analysis methods, a matrix of similarity of mechanics reflecting their categorization in children's minds was constructed, and stable emotional reactions and associations of children regarding key elements of the combat system (ice – control, wind – humor, electricity – ingenuity, fire – danger, etc.) were identified.


As a result of the study, three clusters of mechanics were identified (“Turn Skip,” “Weakening and Restriction,” “Direct Damage”) and a preference rating was compiled, in which tactical mechanics took the leading positions, while force (direct damage) mechanics were not a priority and were described by children as boring. Thus, the hypothesis regarding the preferences of the children's audience was fully confirmed: the core of a safe combat system should consist of non-violent tactical mechanics (70-80%) that ensure the intellectual engagement of players, combined with tactical-force mechanics aimed at their emotional release.


The practical significance of the study is determined by the possibility of applying the developed recommendations in the design of children's video games, as well as the adaptation of the proposed methodology for similar studies.

Article Details

How to Cite
Kutuzov, A. A., and M. V. Shmatko. “Designing a Non-Violent Combat System for a Children’s RPG Game”. Russian Digital Libraries Journal, vol. 29, no. 5, Sept. 2026, pp. 1585-09, doi:10.26907/1562-5419-2026-29-5-1585-1609.

References

1. Martinez L., Gimenes M., Lambert E. Video games and board games: Effects of playing practice on cognition // PLoS ONE. 2023. Vol. 18, No. 5. e0283654.
2. Pallavicini F., Ferrari A., Mantovani F. Video Games for Well-Being: A Systematic Review on the Application of Computer Games for Cognitive and Emotional Training in the Adult Population // Front. Psychol. 2018. Vol. 9. P. 2127.
3. Sattar S., Iqbal Y., Yousaf R. Impact of Playing Video Games on Cognitive Functioning and Learning Styles of Adolescents // Sukkur IBA Journal of Computing and Mathematical Sciences. 2021. Vol. 5, No. 2. P. 49–59.
4. Villani D., Carissoli C., Triberti S., Marchetti A., Confalonieri E., Riva G. Video games, emotion and emotion regulation: expanding the scope // Annals of the International Communication Association. 2018. Vol. 42, No. 2. P. 125–143.
5. Ali N., Tajuddin S., Bramantoro A. Classification of Game Mechanics: A Brief Review // Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Advances in Computational Science and Engineering. ICACSE 2023. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, Vol. 1199. Singapore: Springer, 2024. P. 313329.
6. Wang D. Analysis of Key Mechanics for The Impact of Game Design on Player Experience // Transactions on Computer Science and Intelligent Systems Research. 2025. Vol. 9. P. 331–336.
7. Cassidy B., Antani D., Read J. Using an open card sort with children to categorize games in a mobile phone application store // Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). New York: ACM, 2013. P. 2287–2290.
8. Russell J., Bullock M. Multidimensional Scaling of Emotional Facial Expressions: Similarity from Preschoolers to Adults // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1985. Vol. 48, No. 5. P. 1290–1298.
9. Mironova N.I. Associativnyj jeksperiment: metody analiza dannyh i analiz na osnove universalnoj shemy // Voprosy psiholingvistiki. 2011. No. 14. P. 108–119.