Construction of a “Neuron Activity–Class” Mapping in a Convolutional Spiking Neural Network with STDP Training
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper investigates the problem of constructing a mapping between the spiking activity of a convolutional spiking neural network and the class of an input image. This problem arises after unsupervised training: the convolutional layer forms an event-based representation of the image, but the network itself does not contain a ready-made mechanism for assigning a class label. The aim of the study is to evaluate how informative the spike counters of the convolutional layer are after training with the STDP rule (Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity, a biologically plausible learning rule for impulse-based, or spiking, neural networks) and to assess the performance of a linear readout classifier as the number of training presentations increases.
The experiments were conducted on the MNIST dataset, a standard dataset of handwritten digit images. A single-layer architecture was used: one convolutional layer with 32 feature maps, a 5 × 5 kernel, and an output dimensionality of 32 × 24 × 24, corresponding to 18432 LIF neurons, where LIF denotes the leaky integrate-and-fire neuron model. The input images were encoded using a deterministic Poisson encoder; the Poisson encoding multiplier was set to 0.006. The presentation duration, that is, the time during which an object was shown to the network, was 100 time steps. Training was performed from scratch using the STDP rule, without resuming from a previously saved state. For evaluation, a protocol was used in which spike counters were collected on 10000 training images and 10000 test images.
In the main experiment, with 15000 STDP training presentations, an accuracy of 0.8883 was achieved. The baseline label-map approach, close to the method of Diehl and Cook, produced an accuracy of about 0.48 under the same configuration. The coverage of the calibrated label map was 219 out of 18,432 neurons, while the average activity was 4,146.9416 spikes per image. The neighboring scale point with 10,000 training presentations yielded an accuracy of 0.8876. The results show that the chosen method for reading out activity has a substantial effect on the final classification quality: a linear readout classifier based on the full vector of network spike counters extracts distributed information that is lost when labels are assigned directly to individual neurons.
Article Details
References
2. Maass W. Networks of Spiking Neurons: The Third Generation of Neural Network Models // Neural Networks. 1997. Vol. 10, No. 9. P. 1659–1671.
3. Davies M. et al. Loihi: A Neuromorphic Manycore Processor with On-Chip Learning // IEEE Micro. 2018. Vol. 38, No. 1. P. 82–99.
4. Chertopolokhov V., Devyatkin D., Serov A., Babaev A., Zeleniy A., Kamyshinsky R., Khmelenin D., Gerasimov E., Tsybin I., Trigub A. L., Kashkarov P., Toshchev A., Popov A. Advancing Neural Networks: Innovations and Impacts on Energy Consumption // Advanced Electronic Materials. 2024. Vol. 10, No. 8. Art. 2400029.
5. Toschev A. et al. Critical Analysis of Energy Consumption in Neuro-Computational Systems // IEEE Access. 2026. Art. 60535.
6. Toshchev A.S. Generaciya vremennyh signalov iz staticheskih izobrazhenij dlya podachi na spajkovye nejronnye seti // Russian Digital Library Journal. 2026. T. 29. № 3. P. 1061–1077.
7. Diehl P.U., Cook M. Unsupervised Learning of Digit Recognition Using Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity // Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience. 2015. Vol. 9. Art. 99.
8. Kheradpisheh S.R., Ganjtabesh M., Thorpe S.J., Masquelier T. STDP-Based Spiking Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Object Recognition // Neural Networks. 2018. Vol. 99. P. 56–67.
9. LeCun Y., Bottou L., Bengio Y., Haffner P. Gradient-Based Learning Applied to Document Recognition // Proceedings of the IEEE. 1998. Vol. 86, No. 11. P. 2278–2324.
10. Bi G.Q., Poo M.M. Synaptic Modifications in Cultured Hippocampal Neurons: Dependence on Spike Timing, Synaptic Strength, and Postsynaptic Cell Type // The Journal of Neuroscience. 1998. Vol. 18, No. 24. P. 10464–10472.
11. Caporale N., Dan Y. Spike Timing-Dependent Plasticity: A Hebbian Learning Rule // Annual Review of Neuroscience. 2008. Vol. 31. P. 25–46.
12. Izhikevich E.M. Which Model to Use for Cortical Spiking Neurons? // IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks. 2004. Vol. 15, No. 5. P. 1063–1070.
13. Hazan H. et al. BindsNET: A Machine Learning-Oriented Spiking Neural Networks Library in Python // Frontiers in Neuroinformatics. 2018. Vol. 12. Art. 89.
14. Pedregosa F. et al. Scikit-Learn: Machine Learning in Python // Journal of Machine Learning Research. 2011. Vol. 12. P. 2825–2830.
15. Kingma D.P., Ba J. Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization // International Conference on Learning Representations. 2015.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Presenting an article for publication in the Russian Digital Libraries Journal (RDLJ), the authors automatically give consent to grant a limited license to use the materials of the Kazan (Volga) Federal University (KFU) (of course, only if the article is accepted for publication). This means that KFU has the right to publish an article in the next issue of the journal (on the website or in printed form), as well as to reprint this article in the archives of RDLJ CDs or to include in a particular information system or database, produced by KFU.
All copyrighted materials are placed in RDLJ with the consent of the authors. In the event that any of the authors have objected to its publication of materials on this site, the material can be removed, subject to notification to the Editor in writing.
Documents published in RDLJ are protected by copyright and all rights are reserved by the authors. Authors independently monitor compliance with their rights to reproduce or translate their papers published in the journal. If the material is published in RDLJ, reprinted with permission by another publisher or translated into another language, a reference to the original publication.
By submitting an article for publication in RDLJ, authors should take into account that the publication on the Internet, on the one hand, provide unique opportunities for access to their content, but on the other hand, are a new form of information exchange in the global information society where authors and publishers is not always provided with protection against unauthorized copying or other use of materials protected by copyright.
RDLJ is copyrighted. When using materials from the log must indicate the URL: index.phtml page = elbib / rus / journal?. Any change, addition or editing of the author's text are not allowed. Copying individual fragments of articles from the journal is allowed for distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon article, even commercially, as long as they credit that article for the original creation.
Request for the right to reproduce or use any of the materials published in RDLJ should be addressed to the Editor-in-Chief A.M. Elizarov at the following address: amelizarov@gmail.com.
The publishers of RDLJ is not responsible for the view, set out in the published opinion articles.
We suggest the authors of articles downloaded from this page, sign it and send it to the journal publisher's address by e-mail scan copyright agreements on the transfer of non-exclusive rights to use the work.