Methods of Cognitive Modeling and Hybrid Evolutionary Multi-Criteria Algorithms in a Multi-Agent Information-Analytical System

Main Article Content

Vasiliy Borisovich Chechnev

Abstract

The paper proposes an approach to multi-criteria decision support based on a cognitively oriented multi-agent information-analytical system. Cognitive modeling methods are developed, including a formal ontological representation of knowledge about production planning and a coalition–holonic agent architecture that ensures adaptability and transparency of computations. A hybrid evolutionary multi-criteria algorithm is introduced, in which agents generate alternative plans at the local level using a parallel genetic algorithm that optimizes a combination of several criteria. At the global level, a multi-stage selection of alternatives is implemented with filtering of resource overloads and similar solutions, followed by final aggregation using the PROMETHEE and ELECTRE multi-criteria decision-making methods.


An experimental study is carried out comparing manual planning with planning supported by the developed system, as well as analyzing the impact of dynamic adaptation of the genetic algorithm parameters. The results show that the use of the system makes it possible to reduce plan generation time by a factor of 20–30 while maintaining or improving solution quality. At the same time, resource overloads are completely eliminated, and early termination of evolutionary computations is ensured without loss of solution quality. The system and proposed algorithms are intended for use in planning project activities at manufacturing enterprises.

Article Details

How to Cite
Chechnev, V. B. “Methods of Cognitive Modeling and Hybrid Evolutionary Multi-Criteria Algorithms in a Multi-Agent Information-Analytical System”. Russian Digital Libraries Journal, vol. 29, no. 1, Feb. 2026, pp. 368-84, doi:10.26907/1562-5419-2026-29-1-368-384.

References

1. Brown A. Reactive Applications with Akka.NET. N.Y.: Manning Publications Co., 2019. 280 p.
2. The Reactive Manifesto. URL: https://www.reactivemanifesto.org/ru (12.11.2025).
3. Dauzère-Pérès S., Ding J., Shen L., Tamssaouet K. The flexible job shop scheduling problem: A review // European Journal of Operational Research. 2024. Vol. 314, No. 2. P. 409–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2023.05.017
4. Caselli G., Delorme M., Iori M., Magni C.A. Exact algorithms for a parallel machine scheduling problem with workforce and contiguity constraints // Computers & Operations Research. 2024. Vol. 163, No. 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2023.106484
5. Xiong H., Shi S., Ren D., Hu J. A survey of job shop scheduling problem: The types and models // Computers & Operations Research. 2022. Vol. 142, No. 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2022.105731
6. Gu H., Zhang Y., Zinder Y. An efficient optimization procedure for the work-force scheduling and routing problem: Lagrangian relaxation and iterated local search // Computers & Operations Research. 2022. Vol. 144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2022.105829
7. Borgonjon T., Maenhout B. A genetic algorithm for the personnel task re-scheduling problem with time preemption // Expert Systems with Applications. 2024. Vol. 238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121868
8. Thiruvady D., Nguyen S., Sun Y., Shiri F., Zaidi N., Li X. Adaptive population-based simulated annealing for resource constrained job scheduling with uncertainty // International Journal of Production Research. 2024. Vol. 62, No. 17. P. 6227–6250. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2024.2311183
9. Gad A.G. Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm and Its Applications: A Systematic Review // Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering. 2022. Vol. 29, No. 5. P. 2531–2561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-021-09694-4
10. Chechnev V.B. Analiz i klassifikatsiya mnogokriterial'nykh metodov prinyati-ya resheniy // Ontologiya proektirovaniya. 2024. Vol. 14, No. 4(54). P. 607–624 (In Rus-sian). https://doi.org/10.18287/2223-9537-2024-14-4-607-624
11. Roy B. The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods // Theory and Decision. 1991. Vol. 31, No. 1. P. 49–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134132
12. Brans J.P., Vincke P., Mareschal B. How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method // European Journal of Operational Research. 1986. Vol. 24, No. 2. P. 228–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(86)90044-5
13. Ataeva O.M., Kalyonov N.E., Serebryakov V.A. Ontologicheskiy podkhod k opisaniyu edinogo tsifrovogo prostranstva nauchnykh znaniy // Russian Digital Library Journal. 2021. Vol. 24, No. 1. P. 3–19 (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.26907/1562-5419-2021-24-1-3-19
14. Chechnev V.B. Ispol'zovanie sistem podderzhki prinyatiya resheniy v avtomatizatsii protsessov prinyatiya resheniy // Elektronnye biblioteki. 2025. Vol. 28, No. 1. P. 163–183 (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.26907/1562-5419-2025-28-1-163-183
15. Baluta V.I., Osipov V.P., Sivakova T.V. Predlozheniya po razrabotke sredstv povysheniya effektivnosti upravleniya v usloviyakh epidemiy // Elektronnye biblioteki. 2021. Vol. 24, No. 1. P. 20–41 (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.26907/1562-5419-2021-24-1-20-41
16. Tsibizova T.Y., Lyapuntsova E.V., Makarova M.P. et al. Kognitivnoe mod-elirovanie. M.: MGTU im. N.E. Baumana, 2025. 252 pp. (In Russian).