The Problem of Building Synthetic Psychological Data: Experience in Modeling Reactions to Frustration

Main Article Content

Anfisa Anvarovna Chuganskaya
Danil Alekseevich Kireev
Ivan Valentinovich Smirnov
Oleg Georgievich Grigoriev

Abstract

The issue of generating synthetic data for psychological research remains relevant and complex. The problems of confidentiality, reliability, validity, and accuracy of conclusions are unevenly represented in different areas of psychology and are actually related to the use of synthetic data in related sciences such as medicine, sociology, history, political science, and economics. The study of various psychological phenomena in large social groups is associated with the analysis of complex and difficult-to-formalize constructs. Synthetic data refers to artificially generated data based on algorithms and modeling.


  1. Rosenzweig's classification of types of reactions to frustration was chosen as the basis for this study. When analyzing online discourse, there is a problem of the low number of certain types. This is especially true for the class of impunitive reactions. The paper analyzes the possibility of creating text corpora using synthetic data of reactions to frustration generated by large language models.

During the experiments, the experts created prompts and generated examples of impulsive reactions using four large language models, with 10 examples of each type of reaction. They then evaluated the contextual validity and quality of the generated responses.


The results obtained allowed them to identify the weaknesses in generating texts with complex psychological phenomena for training neural network models.

Article Details

How to Cite
Chuganskaya, A. A., D. A. Kireev, I. V. Smirnov, and O. G. Grigoriev. “The Problem of Building Synthetic Psychological Data: Experience in Modeling Reactions to Frustration”. Russian Digital Libraries Journal, vol. 29, no. 4, July 2026, pp. 1235-52, doi:10.26907/1562-5419-2026-29-4-1235-1252.

References

1. Panov A.I., Kovalev A.K., Chuganskaya A.A. Large Language Models as Approximators of Meaning in the Iconic Worldview // Pospelov Readings: Artificial Intelligence – Problems and Prospects. Proceedings of the All-Russian Conference. Moscow, 2022. P. 53–70.
2. Salova T.L., Suvorov I.S. Synthetic data: problems and ways to solve them // Mathematical Structures and Modeling. 2025. No. 3 (75). P. 116–121. https://doi.org/10.24147/2222-8772.2025.3.116-121
3. Bakunov A.M., Bakunova O.M., Alexandrovich A.F., Vladysik M.S., Meleshkevich D.V., Sitnik M.Y. Methods of big data processing in psychological research // International Academy Journal Web of Scholar. 2020. No. 7 (49). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/metody-obrabotki-bolshih-dannyh-v-psihologicheskih-issledovaniyah (date of appeal: 02/25/2026).
4. Xu X., Yao B., Dong Y., Gabriel S., Yu H., Hendler J., Ghassemi M., Dey A.K., Wang D. Mental-LLM: Leveraging Large Language Models for Mental Health Prediction via Online Text Data. // Proc. of the ACM on interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies, 2024. No. 8 (1), 31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3643540
5. Strachan J.W.A., Albergo D., Borghini G. et al. Testing theory of mind in large language models and humans // Nature Human Behaviour, 2024. No. 8. P. 1285–1295. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-01882-z
6. Vanin A., Bolshev V., Panfilova A. Applying LLM and Topic Modelling in Psychotherapeutic Contexts // arXiv:2412.17449. Dec. 2024. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2412.17449
7. Khlebnikova A.A., Bityutskaya E.V., Kalachev G.V., Gasanov E.E. Automation of Markup of Texts about Life Difficulties Using Large Language Models // Intelligent Systems. Theory and Applications. 2025. Vol. 29, issue 3. P. 53–75.
8. Kang A. et al. Synthetic data generation with LLM for improved depression prediction // arXiv:2411.17672. 2024. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.17672
9. Ghanadian H., Nejadgholi I. Al Osman H. Socially aware synthetic data generation for suicidal ideation detection using large language models // IEEE Access. 2024. Vol. 12. P. 14350–14363.
10. Lorge I. et al. Detecting the clinical features of difficult-to-treat depression using synthetic da-ta from large language models // Computers in Biology and Medicine. 2025. Vol. 194. P. 110246.
11. Devyatkin D., Chudova N., Salimovskyi V. Method for Automated Recognition of Frustration-Derived Aggression in Texts // In: Velichkovsky B.M., Balaban P.M., Ushakov V.L. (Eds.) Advances in Cognitive Research, Artificial Intelligence and Neuroinformatics. Intercognsci 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Vol. 1358. Springer, Cham, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71637-0_76
12. Devyatkin D.A., Enikolopov S.N., Salimovskiy V.A., Chudova N.V. Speech reactions to frustration: automatic categorization // Psychological Research, 2021. No. 2. https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v14i78.160
13. Cohen C.M., Su Z., Hsien-Te Kao et al. Exploring Big Five Personality and AI Capability Effects in LLM-Simulated Negotiation Dialogues // arXiv:2506.15928 2025. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.15928
14. Levitov N.D. Frustration as a type of mental state // Voprosy psikhologii. 1967. No. 6. P. 118–129.
15. Rosenzweig S. An Outline of Frustration Theory // Personality and behavior disorders. Hunt V.N.Y., 1949.
16. Rosenzweig S. The Picture-association method and its application in a study of reactions to frustration of personality, 1945.
17. Maier N.R.B. Frustration theory: restatement and extension // Psychological review, 1956. Vol. 63, No. 6. P. 370–388.
18. Tarabrina P.V. Experimental psychological methodology for studying frustration reactions: Methodological recommendations. Leningrad, 1984.


Most read articles by the same author(s)